|
Image
Analytics public information principles and methods
At Image Analytics, we first audit the perceptions of target constituents
I.E.: legislators, local, national, regional or tribal governments,
investors, educators and strategic partners. Simultaneously, we develop
a matrix of needs and goals relative to each target group. Then, through
organized research, we develop communication plans for each target group.
Getting across the message is a challenge of another sort.
Each target constituent has his or her own point of reference, so its
important to take both a general and a specific approach and then test
for effectiveness whenever possible.
In
the near term, what is most important is to develop an integrated, cohesive,
well thought-out plan that articulates key messages. These should be developed
from a global focus, a target-constituent focus, and a regional (I.E.:
province-by-province) focus.
These messages are then articulated in a simple, easy-to-use, visual and
written format that will ensure every member of your staff knows what
is appropriate to say, and when. A portion of your Intranet can contain
written information to support individual image components that might
come under discussion.
As a general tactic, we leverage the Web and maximize its potential through
localization, community building, partnership development, Web site traffic
programs, newsletters, forums, bulletin boards, educational components
and a complete virtual press center.
There are a number of techniques for communicating with the public; however,
each letter, notice, or meeting must be planned to suit the specific proposed
activity. Typically, organizations will rely on conventional, habitual
ways of relating to a target group instead of greeting the audience in
a new way, in a new day, every day.
Our process relies on constant, early, close contact with real people
(as opposed to political opportunists) to gain real insight into their
needs and perceptions. These are, after all, always changing. Then realistic
goals are set that project success for a number of plans based on outcomes
that take into account the target customers point-of-view.
This process involves creativity and a high degree of client contact,
but results in innovative, results-driven programs that dont try
to get people to do something theyre not inclined to do, but instead,
moves them towards a desired goal using their own momentum. Effective
programs are likely to be developed if they are planned on the basis of
the needs of the target group, identified in conjunction with them, and
involving them in implementation.
This tactic assumes that not all members of a target group can be convinced
to support a particular position. There are, in fact, four levels of support
that an individual target member can take and only one of these will result
in the failure of a program. The four levels are: Opposition, Permission,
Adoption, Promotion. (Voting against it, not voting, voting for it, working
to get votes for it.)
To move someone from Opposition to Permission, you must take them through
five steps. They must recognize:
1. There is a serious problem that must be solved at all costs;
2. Its your job to solve it somehow;
3. This is one far and reasonable solution; there may be others;
4. The people developing this solution have heard the concerns and ideas
of all;
5. The option is the best one available, actually solves the problem
and is better than the alternative which is doing nothing at all.
This process involves structured (yet relatively informal), face-to-face
interaction among representatives of stakeholder groups. The goal is to
simply gain early participation from those with differing viewpoints.
This encourages informed debate on priorities and direction, and helps
to understand the expectations and concerns of everyone involved. It also
helps to identify potential adopters or supporters who might be outside
the process.
We identify the potential controversies and get as much information as
possible about the constituents view of the proposal. This allows us to
respond to public comments or alternatives, suggest revisions to the program
or communication plan and lessens the chance for public grievances, appeals,
litigation, and media attacks.
At the very
least it produces sound policies with a wide range of support, and reducing
the likelihood of subsequent disagreements or even political or legal
challenges.
As a tactical note, consider, promotional press events, displays and demonstrations.
I.E.: rather than stuffy speeches or podium presentations, creating kiosks
and contests that are much more effective at getting the point across.
|
|